@sda Sharing unpublished non-peer-reviewed studies in opposition to much higher quality studies that show the opposite is **not** science.

Moreover sharing this sort of wreckless propaganda puts children and people in danger. It is reckless and irresponsible of you IMO.

@freemo
So... PubMed is a branch of the National Library of Medicine which is a branch of National Institute of Health.

Are they disseminating wreckless propaganda when they publish studies showing the benefits of vaccination, or are they disseminating wreckless propaganda when they publish studies showing the dangers of vaccination?

Is it possible for a medical technology to be 100% "good" or 100% "bad" or do you suppose everything in the medical world has benefit/risk considerations?

@sda Can you please link to the actual study published in a peer reviewed paper then.

Follow

@freemo It is not a single study, but about 40 different studies.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.