>The Aryan race is an obsolete historical race concept which emerged in the late 19th century to describe people of Indo-European heritage as a racial grouping.[1] The theory has been widely rejected and disproved since no anthropological, historical or archaeological evidence exists.[2][3][4]
secretly changes le name to "Indo-European" instead
>The Proto-Indo-Europeans are a hypothetical prehistoric population of Eurasia who spoke Proto-Indo-European (PIE), the ancestor of the Indo-European languages according to linguistic reconstruction.
magically un-debunked
secretly changes le name to "Indo-European" instead
>The Proto-Indo-Europeans are a hypothetical prehistoric population of Eurasia who spoke Proto-Indo-European (PIE), the ancestor of the Indo-European languages according to linguistic reconstruction.
magically un-debunked
@skells i really don't know shit about it and think the nazi/evola obsession with Indian mysticism is a little retarded, however they're not even trying when it comes to gatekeeping on it. it's literally the exact same theory, one with a different name. and one of them is fine and the other is debunked pure evil
@sim @augustus @skells
it's not without merit, it's just the most widely accepted one but there are other theories a bit more recent like MRE that accept african origin but not as recent, and they highlight the mixture with other hominids on each area more
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiregional_origin_of_modern_humans
it's not without merit, it's just the most widely accepted one but there are other theories a bit more recent like MRE that accept african origin but not as recent, and they highlight the mixture with other hominids on each area more
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiregional_origin_of_modern_humans
