@YorkshireTea @Humpleupagus @skells COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report – week 1
8
Effectiveness against hospitalisation
Several studies have estimated vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation in older ages, all of which indicate higher levels of protection
against hospitalisation with all vaccines against the Alpha variant (8, 9, 10, 11). Effectiveness against hospitalisation of over 90% is also
observed with the Delta variant with all 3 vaccines (Figure 3, 3). In most groups there is relatively limited waning of protection against
hospitalisation over a period of at least 5 months after the second dose. Greater waning appears to occur among those in clinical risk
groups (Figure 3, 3)

@Humpleupagus @YorkshireTea @skells High levels of protection (over 90%) are also seen against mortality with all 3 vaccines and against both the Alpha and Delta variants
(Figure 5, 8, 12, 3). Relatively limited waning of protection against mortality is seen over a period of at least 5 months

@11112011 @Humpleupagus @skells

You can take quotes from the datasheets until the cows come home for all I care. 🤡

I'm just interested in the numbers.

They can spin things all they like but the numbers don't lie buddy.

Lets have a look at Absolute Risk Reduction shall we?

80+ 19%
70-79 7%
60-69. 2% 🤡
50-59 0.5% 🤡 🤡
40-49. 0.15% 🤡 🤡 🤡
30-39. 0.05% 🤡 🤡 🤡 🤡
18-29. 0.01% 🤡 🤡 🤡 🤡 🤡

Your opening graphs are complete BS.

@YorkshireTea @Humpleupagus @skells u sent the link stop cherry picking lol

@YorkshireTea @Humpleupagus @skells efectivenees against hospitalisation 8

@11112011 @Humpleupagus @skells

Hospital overnight stays page 37 🤔

@YorkshireTea @Humpleupagus @skells read 8 plz go on

@11112011 @Humpleupagus @skells

Page 8 wow. Smells like relative numbers rather than absolute buddy. You know why they use relative? Cos they're usually bigger numbers.

When you're stabbing the populace like they're on a merry-go-round the only thing that should matter is ABSOLUTE numbers.

You can see from an earlier post why they refuse to talk about those. 😉

Short (!!) term benefit for 70+ but for everyone else this is pretty much a dud.

@YorkshireTea @Humpleupagus @skells page 8 smells relative the ones u like are fine in the same link

@11112011 @Humpleupagus @skells

So what's the source for those nice graphs of yours mate? 🙄

@YorkshireTea @Humpleupagus @skells me

@11112011 @Humpleupagus @skells

So if you plotted the graphs, you must have the raw numbers right? 🤔

@YorkshireTea @Humpleupagus @skells doesnt matter what i have ur own link says im right

@11112011 @Humpleupagus @skells

oh dear, you don't seem to have any data do you? 💩

@YorkshireTea @Humpleupagus @skells not ur prob read ur own sources its there its a fact by now

@11112011 @Humpleupagus @skells

Like I said already.

NUMBERS, NUMBERS, NUMBERS.

You have no data ipso facto your graphs are 💩

I've had 2 years of propaganda so I kinda don't care what they have to say anymore. If what they say was true my graphs would reflect it.

@YorkshireTea @Humpleupagus @skells its there pics and all

@11112011 @Humpleupagus @YorkshireTea the trusted news initiative would like to award to some grant money, blitz

@skells @Humpleupagus @YorkshireTea i didnt sent the link whats wrong doesnt sute u

@11112011 @Humpleupagus @YorkshireTea data may be legit but does it have anything to do with Omicron