@7 if it's the first of its kind they'd have to do it between their two nations, otherwise the logistics would be incredibly complex to ship/supply Chinese forces to/in Ukraine and vice versa
@7 we're in 1930 not 1938 and Ukraine is China, if I had to guess
@skells I think that would be correct if Russia weren’t deadlocked in the Ukraine, and if it weren’t done as a PR campaign. Two birds with one stone, to be sure, but look at what’s between them – it’s not that great of terrain to be practicing in considering their interests. The BRICS nations will appreciate it, certaily.
@7 Russia doesn't need the commodities Japan did, what it wants is BRICS to break from the West/multipolar world
US wants Ukraine to be another Afghanistan
Russia wants to show cajones in resisting US hegemony
place your bets
@skells I’m done even feigning sides in this matter, I’m in it for studying the military strategy and geopolitics. I want BRICS to break away for all the positive and negative reasons, and I want the US to make it’s death rattles, and I want to see the patriots rally for exactly what they were against a few years prior, and I want to see what comes of it all. The US has done such an amazing job at crippling itself that it’s six-to-five and pick-‘em what would happen if a world war broke out; it’s no who is stronger, it’s can the Americans reinvigorate a national war industry given the last 40 years, and can they do it before the Chinese and Russian junk-heaps are able to do what little they would need to do? And that’s if a declaration of war didn’t crack the country into pieces and leave a far bigger mess to clean up for any invading force.
@7 my hope is that neither sides have it in them for a world war and a relatively peaceful, natural devolution of centralised state power occurs
tbh I think most everyone other than the upper echelons (and their respective NPCs) of US and EU are hoping for that outcome.
If it came to it both could swing hard - the historical precedent (read Franks/Crusades) is for the West to sweep all before it in decisive battles while bleeding out strategically
@7 like, Ukraine could kick Russia out. OK. What's US gonna do, unfreeze their funds? That ship has sailed and everyone knows it has.
@skells Definitely, I didn’t mean to discount that. I was mostly just rambling. I had thought about, after hitting enter, the EU’s dependency on the US and how that was essentially Woodrow Wilson’s dream so uh, yeah, nice going there everyone, but I couldn’t fit it smoothly into the paragraph.
@7 there's a good piece by Rothbard, Wall Street, The banks and American Foreign Policy that's very germane to the discussion - spoiler, investment in China makes wwiii a bit of a nono
@skells I just cannot imagine that the investments in China will not turn out like, well, investments in China always do. This is the part I never see people mention.
@7 on a long enough timescale (10-20 years) I don't see how it's gonna go anywhere but up
whether your investment reflects that with all the CBDC bullshit is another matter, I agree
@skells Oh 100%, the long-term is still optimistic despite how dark this decade looks in specific, and for everyone, which is why at times my tone regarding the war can seem… tasteless.
@7 if you don't gloat over battlefield causalities you're basically landed nobility at this rate
@skells Heavens no. When I read that there were teenagers on the Moskva, I was sick. Kids, with proud parents, who can’t know whether their kid is alive or dead.
@skells @dubh they take gold, they perform a chemical procedure to layer a precise thickness of atoms to a binder, they laminate that and put a pretty shiny picture on it, and it’s a money that’s legal in a few states now. https://nevadagoldback.com/
@7 god forbid the nuclear war bit