I find the etiquette of Calendly (and other appointment booking things) really interesting
I've heard some people are offended by the suggestion that they use that to book a slot rather than doing a back-and-forth to find the right time for both parties
I see it as respectful of my time when someone suggests Calendly rather than having us back-and-forth over several cycles
I'd love to understand this dynamic more
• An Oxford comma walks into a bar where it spends the evening watching the television, getting drunk, and smoking cigars.
• A dangling participle walks into a bar. Enjoying a cocktail and chatting with the bartender, the evening passes pleasantly.
• A bar was walked into by the passive voice.
• An oxymoron walked into a bar, and the silence was deafening.
• Two quotation marks walk into a “bar.”
• A malapropism walks into a bar, looking for all intensive purposes like a wolf in cheap clothing, muttering epitaphs and casting dispersions on his magnificent other, who takes him for granite.
• Hyperbole totally rips into this insane bar and absolutely destroys everything.
• A question mark walks into a bar?
• A non sequitur walks into a bar. In a strong wind, even turkeys can fly.
• Papyrus and Comic Sans walk into a bar. The bartender says, "Get out -- we don't serve your type."
• A mixed metaphor walks into a bar, seeing the handwriting on the wall but hoping to nip it in the bud.
• A comma splice walks into a bar, it has a drink and then leaves.
• Three intransitive verbs walk into a bar. They sit. They converse. They depart.
• A synonym strolls into a tavern.
• At the end of the day, a cliché walks into a bar -- fresh as a daisy, cute as a button, and sharp as a tack.
• A run-on sentence walks into a bar it starts flirting. With a cute little sentence fragment.
• Falling slowly, softly falling, the chiasmus collapses to the bar floor.
• A figure of speech literally walks into a bar and ends up getting figuratively hammered.
• An allusion walks into a bar, despite the fact that alcohol is its Achilles heel.
• The subjunctive would have walked into a bar, had it only known.
• A misplaced modifier walks into a bar owned a man with a glass eye named Ralph.
• The past, present, and future walked into a bar. It was tense.
• A dyslexic walks into a bra.
• A verb walks into a bar, sees a beautiful noun, and suggests they conjugate. The noun declines.
• A simile walks into a bar, as parched as a desert.
• A gerund and an infinitive walk into a bar, drinking to forget.
• A hyphenated word and a non-hyphenated word walk into a bar and the bartender nearly chokes on the irony.
The rotation of Nesman.
If this flame is beautiful, ⭐ or boost this post to improve its chances for future breedings.
#fractalArt
Sabey in motion.
If this flame is beautiful, ⭐ or boost this post to improve its chances for future breedings.
#artBot
Recently places like @SIDN (Dutch national operator of .NL) have been claiming that nobody in Europe can deliver their computer needs, and that they are therefore forced to outsource operations to American cloud providers. Meanwhile our own IT industry denies this. Here I delve into what's going on, and how Europe is being Cloud Naïve instead of Cloud Native.
https://berthub.eu/articles/posts/cloud-naive-europe-and-the-megascaler/
Fun thing I learned today. To normal people "ethernet" sounds like some kind of wireless network. And they will tell you that the wifi isn't working after selecting ethernet in the Windows 11 installer (since they don't know ethernet needs a cable). I can't even blame them, "ethernet" does sound like some kind of radio thing ("in the ether").
This week, we talked about the Embedded Online Conference and our experience learning Zephyr.
Listen to episode 475: https://embedded.fm/episodes/475.
We also talked about writing vs reading code.
Here's Chris' take:
it's so strange that despite being fairly tired (after a 3h train trip today) i'm... not in acute pain? even at the trough of the painkiller concentration? (i am not actually confused) how is this possible?? is this real??? did someone substitute the universe around me with a fake one that's inexplicably better????
#STS and adjacent people, I'm looking for reading recs on scifi + "capital S monolithic Science" as religion/pseudoreligion
not looking for the actual historical ties between religious institutions and research disciplines (tho I won't be mad if you share those too)
looking more for stuff like... how we went from early scifi tales and allegories at a time when many disciplines and methods where only starting out, to the rampant Scientism and TESCREALism of today... how that's played into technocracy and modulated colonial narratives and education and actual R&D initiatives and etc...
there's tons of individual connections to make between religious narratives and contemporary scifi-treated-as-reality, like general AI as both gods and eschatological prophecy. interested in that sort of thing too
For context: A lot of R API stuff got marked as "non API" or "internal", which then precipitates a lot of new NOTEs for established packages.
See for example the CRAN check page for {rlang}: https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_rlang.html
Lots of packages are using SETLENGTH() (for example) - should it be part of the public API since people need it to write packages?
Some days ago, the CRAN check with R-devel started to raise "Found non-API calls to R" NOTE. I'm not sure if they are serious on disallowing these not-so-minor APIs, but what should I do? Do you take some action or just wait? #stats
For example, rlang package now has these NOTE:
File ‘rlang/libs/rlang.so’:
Found non-API calls to R: ‘R_ClosureExpr’, ‘R_PromiseExpr’,
‘SETLENGTH’, ‘SET_ENCLOS’, ‘SET_ENVFLAGS’, ‘SET_TRUELENGTH’
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_rlang.html
I really do miss Swiftkey which was superior in almost every way, but I'd rather use subpar software than live in fear of more Microsoft "AI" features being turned on one day without me knowing it
I think that with a combination of debouncing how frequently the reading server requests from the OP server, and only asking tetiary (replier) servers for new posts off the results from the context
request that it isn't any more of a DoS problem than normal masto operation. Recall that masto is already pretty dang inefficient (eg. if you expand a post, masto will already fetch the profile, which includes fetching pinned posts, preview cards for all links in bio and pinned posts, etc.), and expanding the context of a post would be a directly triggered behavior that matches i think normal expectations: when i look for the replies to that post, i should see the replies to that post. This would tie into any existing privacy controls - a 'followers only' reply wouldn't be reported in the response from the OP -> reading server, the reading server would have to abide by AUTHORIZED_FETCH
, blocks would still hold, etc.
The costs of not having fetch all replies are pretty bad - first is that fedi can feel vacant on smaller servers. it takes actually quite a lot of people with quite a lot of follows to start having anything resembling a conversation among ppl more then 1-deep in a social graph. One of the primary criticisms of the fedi (mastodon specifically) is the high number of reply guys, and if you have ever had a post with even a moderate amount of popularity you are aware how exhausting it is to get exactly the same reply over and over again, as well as pointing well-intentioned people to information/replies/etc. that already exist elsewhere in the replies.
I'll stop there, but I think that the benefits of having fetch all replies pretty strongly outweigh the costs, and so that's why i want to do it efficiently. This is an especially important behavior if we want to get to a point of making the fedi p2p, where we can make sparse state updates more of the norm <3
code / data wrangler in Switzerland.
Compulsive reply guy. Posts random photos once in a while.