"Copyleft is less free than permissive licenses because permissive licenses allow you to make proprietary forks of free software" is a worldview that just straight-up makes no sense at all
The classic users freedom vs developers freedom.
Got into yet another discussion about it, and the usual answer is "yes, but if project x goes proprietary, a fork can happen."
Indeed, **if** it happens.
Follow
@ghisvail
> "if project goes proprietary, a fork can happen"
But past community contributions remain with the project (including non-artifacts like QA by production use).
@drewdevault
