I agree with Cory Doctorow (@pluralistic) that micro-posting WordStreams (see https://mastodon.nzoss.nz/@strypey/112821798550875330) are a medium in themselves.
I like the challenge of breaking my thoughts down into discrete chunks that can be expressed in 500 characters or less. I like the fact that people can comment on a specific chunk, by replying to that post. Which isn't possible in the blogging medium, where comments can only hang off the entire wall of text.
(1/?)
What I realised recently - and Corey probably figured this out already - is that this doesn't work so well in replies. Why not? If my reply is a series of posts and I @mention the people I'm replying to in every one, I can flood their notifications.
Now that I understand how overwhelming and annoying this must be, I apologise to everyone I've done it to. #MeaCulpa
But it's hard to go into any detail in 500 characters. Nuanced replies almost always need more. So what's the solution?
(2/?)
From now on, I'm going to discipline myself to @mentioning people only in the first post of a WordStream (1). So they only get one notification per stream of posts.
I'll also try to make that first post a TL;DR, and continue to use numbering - eg (1/5) - so people know there's more to unpack if they click on it. I'll probably also put the numbers at the top so they're more obvious.
If I forget, please feel free to remind me.
(3/?)
(1) Again, see https://mastodon.nzoss.nz/@strypey/112821798550875330
@strypey would #ConversationContainers by @streams help?
@tetrislife
> would ConversationContainers by @streams help?
Quite possible. Another reminder that I need to give it a test.
@streams