I generally agree with this, but there’s some leaps in here that I don’t think follow the previous. Yes, we should write smaller, simpler apps — things like Electron are terrible for everyone and they’re wasting energy on compute and memory, too.

Rust has its own hurdles to jump through to understand the problem and rewrite things in, and one reason we all wanted to get away from C was the memory safety issues and the complexity that quickly builds. So what else, among the current crop of compiled and type safe systems programming languages, should we look at as another alternative that will let us write small, safe, simple software?

What's the point of lightweight code with modern computers? - Liam on Linux
https://liam-on-linux.dreamwidth.org/97426.html

Follow

@mathias so many options, we just use the popularity/familiarity argument to not use any of them for bigger projects. springs to mind, but maybe too. too, especially if its development hadn't slowed down.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.