Show newer

I think it's an actual conspiracy that American media outlets coverage of politics focuses on pointless, spicy exchanges between political figures, rather than focusing on actual policy issues such as basic income, Gaza, or the climate.

Most of the popular media is owned by politically motivated individuals. They ensure coverage is distracting from the ultimate issue of wealth distribution.

"orange man bad" is a little circus performance to divert energy from actual change we desperately need.

Shout out to my 2nd year students writing tail recursive JavaScript because nobody told them they couldn't.

@plexus people don’t recognize the value of organizing. I see it in the smallest things like organizing game nights for friends. Let alone dependencies, time tables, or budgets. 🫣

«Conserva celosamente tu derecho a reflexionar, porque incluso el hecho de pensar erróneamente es mejor que no pensar en absoluto».

Hipatia

@edavies @Lazarou @skinnylatte

There was that time we ran out of kings and had to use the Scottish one. And also that time slightly before when we had a little war with Scotland (which we blame on the French, because that's basically what France is for).

@david_chisnall Brilliant. 👏👏 And, sadly, spot-on.

I laughed so much I nearly got coffee up my nose.

@skinnylatte he is such a throwback embarrassment, but still too many Brits still think favourably of the Empire.

They get really upset when you bring up all the Famines the British Empire caused....

@Lazarou @skinnylatte It's understandable. History, as I was taught it in a good school in England:

The stone age happened. Then a few other ages involving metals, which were a bit better. No one had a flag and so they probably didn't matter. forging Iron was probably invented in Britain because who else would be clever enough?

The Romans invaded Britain. They invented plumbing and were generally awesome. Pay no attention to the slaves or the fact that it was often worse to be plebian than a slave: in theory the punishment for killing a plebian was worse than for killing a slave, but who would enforce it? The slave owner at least was rich enough to get some form of justice (killing your own slave was fine, of course). The good ones stayed and became British.

Some time passed, and Britain was ruled by baddies. William the Bastard, uh, sorry, Conqueror came along and defeated them. We got an amazing new ruling class of Normans. Anyone who can't speak French is a peasant and not worth paying attention to. For some reason, Alfred the Great was omitted.

And then the Tudors and Stewarts happened. There were some things in between William and Henry VIII (presumably six Henrys, if nothing else) but they weren't important. There were some exciting wars, but the important thing is that we're better than everyone else. Mostly because of Queen Elizabeth I, who worked out that taxing people who didn't go to church made more money than burning people who went to the wrong church. Oh, and then we discovered most of the world and put flags on it. It's ours now, sorry. Oh, and Shakespeare demonstrated that we're better culturally than everyone else, it isn't just that our navy was better.

Did I mention we beat the Spanish? They thought they had a better navy, but we set fire to them. By being awesome. And the best at everything. Including bowling, apparently, which was important for some reason.

Then, shortly after that, we demonstrated that we were the best democracy in the world by chopping the head of the King. It turns out that Puritan fundamentalists weren't actually the best rulers, so we also chopped the head off our non-royal dictator and put control of the country back where it belonged: with the aristocracy.

Then the French chopped the heads of their monarchs too, but because they're less good than us they got carried away and their revolution was just not really cricket, so we had to put them in their place. We single-handedly defeated Napoleon (okay, some Russians were there too, but they mostly ran away and let the winter kill off his soldiers). We didn't do it quite right the first time, so we had to properly defeat him again at Waterloo, but the important thing is that Trafalgar and Waterloo are when we showed the French we were just better than them, repeatedly. We have squares and things named after the battles, so they must have been good!

Around this time, we revolutionised agriculture and pretty much everything else too. We invented all technology.

After that, nothing bad happened for about a hundred years. We definitely didn't exploit India or profit hugely from the slave trade. Oh, and you probably imagined the opium wars (and we definitely weren't the drug pushers, if you did hear something about that). Pay no attention to the Anglo-Afghan war[1], for example.

But then the Germans started causing problems. They didn't have an empire, because they were less good than us, but they wanted one because they were bad people. So we had to defeat them. Some Americans turned up at the end of the war to take credit, but it was mostly us. Definitely not the ANZACs or any Indians, they weren't involved at all.

And then the Germans did it again! Apparently it was slightly our fault for the Treaty of Versailles that helped Hitler come to power, but it has a French name, so it's probably the fault of the French (who, once again, needed us to come and rescue them and should be grateful today). Oh, and there was a depression in the middle, but that wasn't our fault (and we can blame that for Hitler as well, so the second world war was definitely not our fault!). So then we had to defeat them again! This time because our air force and navy are better than everyone else's. Our army was pretty good too. Some Russians and Americans helped out a bit but it was mostly us. Oh, and we invented computers as a side project while winning the war. Everything in the rest of the 20th century is basically built on stuff we did because we're that awesome.

With this kind of history teaching, it's understandable why someone might have a somewhat rosy view of English history and a slightly skewed perception of international relations.

[1] Okay, this is the one that makes me honestly think history might be entirely made up. On our side, the ruler was Queen The Winner, their side was led by King The Greatest. You'd never get away with that in a novel.

`zig build --watch` now works on macOS, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, DragonFlyBSD, and Haiku.

ziglang.org/devlog/2024/#2024-

As of now, the Haiku domain renewals are beginning to propagate. Might take a while for some folks, but things are going back to normal.

#haiku #haikuos

@strypey @kennethb Someone did, and that was the Ottoman Empire, which treated the indigenous Jews well and permitted whatever Jews to come and go...but rejected the moves of Theodor Herzl's organized thugs when they applied for entrance into the Empire and the Levant area. Yeah, Zionism goes back that far. Britain was similarly appalled by Herzl's movement until that bastard Lord Balfour piped up to the contrary.

Pretty much any time you see an "Open" (blank) "Alliance/Coalition", it's actually just Google doing Google things. arstechnica.com/tech-policy/20

The "Open Handset Alliance" was Google's way of preventing anyone from forking their supposedly open source software, lol.

“OpenAI’s stated corporate mission remains “to ensure that artificial general intelligence benefits all of humanity.”

Lol

Show thread

by age 30 you should have:

- acid reflux
- a friend you only call by their last name for reasons no one can articulate
- a fingernail that grows a bit strange due to The Injury
- 12 boxes of unsorted miscellaneous junk at your mom's house that you refuse to take or throw away

tfw you notice you've started the first half of a sentence with words starting with the same letter and you spend the next half an hour trying to finish the sentence without breaking the pattern

If "research" is "come up with endless variations on a theme, all different" then I sure can do research

@aral he's a nationalist, not a fascist. You must not now what fascism is and use it as "bad guy" but when you call people fascist who are obviously not, you just come across as ignorant.

factorcode.org/ is really sweet

the whole listener / inspector is reminiscent of smalltalk

👏

AI is "inevitable" like "racial hierarchies and inequalities are natural and inevitable"

wired.com/story/google-microso

Except racial hierarchies and inequalities are neither natural nor inevitable. They are lies spewed by white supremacists, with no base in science or fact.

AI is not inevitable. AI is happening because too many of us are cowardly, lazy and greedy.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.