Once upon a time the same was said for countries which banned slavery, or which gave women equal rights.
However, since you asked: pre-state societies have been the norm across vast amounts of the world for very long times. Historians have discussed whether medieval Europe can be considered to have states, or at what point the state reemerged as a concept; but almost nobody is claiming that Celtic and Germanic tribes had what could usefully be described as a state. They did have large, economically complex societies though. It wasn't just small villages of mud farmers.
And then of course when you look outside of Europe there have been a plethora of non-state societies, some involving surprising levels of urbanism.
What states are very good at isn't stability but violence, aimed both inwards and outwards. I'm sure we'd all agree that being good at violence isn't something to admire or aspire to. Ted Bundy was not more admirable than his victims.
I've been taking a look at Zulip. There's a lot to like about it. I especially appreciate that it's fully open source, and they have a lot of good documentation on self-hosting.
The topic concept makes it feel like a mix between Slack and a forum. Or like email, but you only get emails from select people.
So why isn't there a #shoveling machine at the gym? It's literally the kind of thing you want to stay in shape for year round so that you don't die when you go to do it after 10 months not doing it
Thanks to a colossal amount of work by Jacob Young, the x86_64 backend of Zig is now passing 101% of the behavior tests compared to the LLVM backend.
Or perhaps put another way, the LLVM backend is passing 99% of the behavior tests compared to the x86_64 backend
Still a few more issues to tackle before it can be made the default, however.
@econads no, there's no background thought on my side. It's just the fact that you come to crowded place like a train station and give a table and two chairs and start saying something. You'll definitely get someone to join your table and say something to you. But if you want to have some civil conversation you want to limit potential opponents to the ones that you know can say something interesting and not any junky
I also don't really a fuck if someone online is woman or man, it doesn't matter.
@profoundlynerdy That's really interesting to hear. I perceive python's popularity as streaming from diametrically opposing sources - grassroots enthusiasm from a wide variety of geeks who found it to be useful. In my mind , the PyCon conference exemplified this: scrappy, inclusive, run at cost by volunteers. Compared to previous establishment like Java or C++, which were very expensive corporate affairs.
@futurebird so. much. junk! I think about this all the time I am going to buy a thing. A lot of the time I end up not buying the thing, because the version that is repairable is like 3 times the price of the shitty one, so maybe I don't need that thing after all - it's a useful filter!
been learning and thinking about the Burrows-Wheeler transform and so far my conclusion is "what the fuck?"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burrows%E2%80%93Wheeler_transform
@mcepl @alontra Well, blame network effect - one can either succumb to the pressure of using proprietary services, or one can take a stand and help give others an alternative. There's no other choice, and both are coercive.
Perhaps my friends/coworkers/community members don't judge my value based on my software choices
Also, what third alternative?
@BuffaloTom @alontra @dansup Here's an #XMPP guide I wrote for new users.
https://contrapunctus.codeberg.page/the-quick-and-easy-guide-to-xmpp.html
pro-libre software, pro-holisticism
pro-communalism, anti-consumerism
fan of #Plan9 and #HaikuOS
anti-witchhunt, see https://stallmansupport.org
I write software (C++) for a living.