Been pondering about my plans.

The delays on the trainings, the radical changes happening in the US and its effect in support of Europe, the rapid changing landscape of warfare in the Invasion of Ukraine by Russia, the rapid changes in the technology due to the war and the rise of Quantum Computing and AI, is making me think that staying in the course of the plan is leaving me behind in terms of growth both in the warfare and STEM departments. Furthermore, there is so much uncertainty about the plan while staying on track for STEM everything is stable and guaranteed feasible.

I guess I have to drop it and get back to my original plan on pursuing the STEM but this also means future warfare involvement will be more on technology instead of physical.

I stay on the plan to go to war and it don't work, I lose both the long term plans for warfare and STEM.

I stay on the plan to pursue STEM, it's guaranteed I get the STEM path at least, and this gives me a more stable tech growth for pursuing high tech weapons development.