@dmbaturin @lain I don't think notability is a problem, especially in Pleroma's case. Restating the comment given, It's more the requirement for "reliable sources", which just means big established names. A news story could be totally baseless and speculative but will get a reference from a Wikipedia article because it's established.
A wise man once put it more simply: "Wikipedia has become just a repository for the mainstream media." and "There are newsworthy events on the Internet at would not make it on Wikipedia [for this reason]"
I now always click on the Talk and History links of every page which has reference in any way to a person. Just the reality of the times.
@dmbaturin @lain Interesting, I might counter the page rejection with that citing, thanks.
Also, Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger wrote about some of it's problems: https://larrysanger.org/2020/05/wikipedia-is-badly-biased/ (offline right now for some reason).
@torresjrjr @lain "Mentioned in a specific kind of a reliable source" is a part of the notability criteria.
Curiously, that very page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(software) says that criteria should be relaxed for free and open source software.