What's "Natural" anyway? https://videos.lukesmith.xyz/videos/watch/d9b77579-4e09-46a1-9e91-2e1e75f101f5
@luke
A vague question but: In a stive to be more "natura", would forbidding usury realistically be part of that today? Is that something we'd want?
I don't even know how to approach this...
https://www.theguardian.com/notesandqueries/query/0,5753,-1030,00.html
https://archive.is/nVYxw
"In the late Middle Ages the problem of financing the royal exchequer and setting up capitalist institutions in the face of the Christian ban on usury was resolved by allowing Jews to act as bankers. They therefore came to be viewed as pariahs, just as cow hide tanners are pariahs in Hindu society. It was in this way that the Jewish community was able to accrue vast wealth and thereby to bring down on its head the loathing of the Christians. Hence Shylock. This enmity is still the underlying basis of modern anti-Semitism."
Good analysis.
Usury means that people are able to take out loans to rise above their station.
Its absence means that families must hoard money and taxes must be low or nonexistent.