Most crypto is "generated" in a way that's bad for planet Earth, however we can use them to pay for our server bills!
Our servers are with Hetzner that generates green energy from 100 percent carbon dioxide-free and environmentally-friendly hydropower 🌱
More info: https://www.hetzner.com/unternehmen/umweltschutz/
Bitcoin: 154MK3JjgSu9n65xGtvrsmbbznANou86sN
Ether: 0x7d33fF0a82caAC12b806ad5Ad973eD98932f6a0E
@stux People also don't know that the problem here is our realiance on non renewable is the problem here, not the existance of our tech in the first place.
@Shredd_Tone I like crypto but...
The way BTC for example is mined is total bullshit.. "Solving" fictious problems for reward doesn't make sense. All that computing power is used the wrong way, I love the idea of getting rewards etc but not for a meaningless "block to mine" in that case it's only about the money no mater the "costs" 
@stux I suppose, but green paper seems strange too.
What I like though is that its decentralised and that anybody that mines is helping some people to send funds for a transaction and can get paid for it in the process. Any random user can help out with that, not just a centralised bank, which is ironic that crypto is getting hogged by all the fat cats.
Though as long as it has value, the only thing I care about is switching to renewable energy.
@Shredd_Tone Problem is that with mining it's the same problem: You need capital to generate capital. So, the big guys with their large mining farms are earning the most. The 'little guy' earns less and in the end it ends up all the same ratio as with paper money.
Like you said, crypto is getting hogged by all the fat cats.
I feel there needs to be a different way of 'generating' the coins than mining. One that might be more fair. Which? I dunno. Because likely you'd need capital to begin with anyway.
@trinsec yeah, I hear you there. I think the way that the world currently is its difficult to keep anything away from the top dogs of the game as long as they want to get their hands on it
