@delawen I get that.

My concern is that your “algorithm” assumes that #privilege is all that matters, and that someone less privileged than you will always be right in their demands.

What if they are confused, fail to see that you are _less_ privileged than them in some other important way, exaggerate their complaints, are dishonest, or mistakenly attribute to your “privilege” an issue that is actually caused by some other factor?

Thus my suggestion of inserting the step _“evaluate their claims rationally”_ and being open to the possibility that sometimes, well, that other person may be wrong and one does not need to change his/her behaviour.