Microsoft just published a paper - modestly titled "AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Models" - that, no joke, uses readily available *online* sample SAT questions to evaluate the GPT class LLMs. The problem, of course, is that same data was likely used to train the same models.

Here's another query : ""Akira came directly, breaking all tradition. Was that it? Had he followed form-had he asked his mother"

Show thread

The paper does state that they did this - ""With regard to data collection, we gather Gaokao and SAT questions from publicly available online
sources, along with their corresponding solutions or explanations".

No mention of all of how this is likely poisoned data.

Show thread
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.