Working on the Data Management and Sharing plan for an NIH grant submission. I am therefore reminded again just how ill-defined and poorly thought through the 2023 NIH data sharing policy is, and responses are getting a bit snippy.

Follow

@merz Ah, metadata standards. I know people in federal labs who've made careers out of writing 500 page metadata documents that no one (justifiably) ever reads.

@twitskeptic @merz queue the xkcd comic about the need for a new standard.

@mglo @twitskeptic

We're not allowed to put hyperlinks in NIH grants. If only that cartoon had a DOI.

@merz @mglo @twitskeptic

Ha! I was just about to warn you. I've caught several hyperlinks in the DMSPs from my colleagues, eg we'll use this standard or store x here, and several core facilities sent letters of support with a hyperlink. I'd be so angry if a grant got rejected because of one of those.

@MCDuncanLab @mglo @twitskeptic

Ha. Submitted internally and then discovered 2 embedded hyperlinks that had slipped into the bibliography 😬

@merz @mglo @twitskeptic

I understand where NIH is coming from, but it should be somewhat easy for them to strip the hyperlinks from the documents, and really a url if it is not hyperlinked should not be a problem. Reviewers would have to intentionally copy and paste to go to a website.

I don't know if I'm being paranoid but I went in and deleted the urls in the footer/header of everyone's letter of support.

@MCDuncanLab @mglo @twitskeptic

The two hyperlinks I found were doi's added by a reference manager. MS Word (or the reference manager) made them into hyperlinks without asking permission. They propagated into the PDF and then the merged PDF generated by ASSIST.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.