Is there a version of Godwin's Law that includes bad quantum theory analogies? https://www.wsj.com/articles/chatgpt-heralds-an-intellectual-revolution-enlightenment-artificial-intelligence-homo-technicus-technology-cognition-morality-philosophy-774331c6
Google's public release of ChatGPT competitor "Bard" is going well. https://www.reuters.com/technology/google-ai-chatbot-bard-offers-inaccurate-information-company-ad-2023-02-08/
A look into our enshittified LLM (Large Language Model) search future. My wife and I were curious about the etymology of 'snob', so we googled it and got this LLM summarized answer from Google's LLM "enhanced" search engine:
"Where does the word snob originate from?"
"The word snob is said to have arisen from the custom of writing “s. nob.”, that is, 'sine nobilitate'"
The problem is that the source (Merriam-Webster) used this as an example of what they called a "spurious etymology" - a fake answer. The LLM ignored this and hallucinated the incorrect answer. Someone who casually referenced this would walk away misinformed.
Can you imagine this happening with, say, medical software? I can and it's not good.
Microsoft just released a demo of BigGPT-Large, which they define as "a domain-specific generative model pre-trained on large-scale biomedical literature, has achieved human parity, outperformed other general and scientific LLMs, and could empower biologists in various scenarios of scientific discovery."
Here's the response to the first question that I asked: @ct_bergstrom @emilymbender
Unprofessional data wrangler and Mastodon’s official fact checker. Older and crankier than you are.