Anyone has experience with covidence.org? I've browsed their webpage, I've watched their introductory video, and I still have no idea what it is for.

I mean, surely it is not a tool to write systematic reviews with LLMs? Hopefully only to assist you in writing them? The PR seems to point to the former.

The video shows icons on Greenland and Siberia as having trusted institutions that use it, which doesn't speak well for the review process prior to releasing the video. Also, the video is entirely content-free: no examples are shown, no specific workflows, or the types of inputs and outputs. And no pointers to systematic reviews written with Covidence. Nothing.

#academia #ScientificPublishing

Follow

@Armavica @albertcardona

They have a few videos on their own YouTube channel but this external review is probably more useful: youtu.be/FW6nsFou_0I?si=q1ONz6

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.