SUPERPOSITIONS i know nothing about, lol This is my hypothesis
The most important part of a superposition is the name because it represents two things relative to each other rather than just a state of something (which will be important, but isn't important for singular position when being measured because we already have names for the positions when we measure them)
Okay, the fun part. I've thought about this term I refer to as a Relationship Pet, which is the concept that a relationship takes more effort than caring about the person; Understanding someone's motivations is to a person as understanding relationship dynamics is to the Relationship Pet
EXample:
Your signo says they need to talk right before they get on a plane. What is the status of the relationship? You could make up a name for it, but the important part is that you don't know the position of the relationship relative to your idea of a functioning relationship
Similarly, I'm guessing that a superposition holds, not just because we don't know the position of a particles in a given moment, but also because it doesn't know the rest of the positions in its environment
The superposition becomes relevant when identifying the "Relationship Pet" of the particle, not the particle itself, and the naming becomes important over the group of measured particles
so if we stitched the up and down positions one day, it would change everything for us, but not the world because everything would be inverted perfectly
Again, not sure if this makes sense or not, this is just me approaching the concepts, lol
Ex:
0d A Rock
1d AC Tree
2d ABC Puppy
3d ABCZ Human
A - Self
B - Barrier
C - Goal
Z - X Variable of 4d Knowledge
A rock understands the force applied to it, and it processes its movement based on the interference between those forces
Trees do understand forces applied to them, but they also understand an ideal state of living by certain measurements (how much water they have, for ex) and they process their movement based on their highest functions first, even though the more fundamental functions are "more important"
Animals understand all these things, but also another thing: Barriers (B). Trees go in a straight line towards goals (they have bends in them, but they themselves go straight) and as close to straight when blocked. Animals process barriers as things that need to specifically be reacted to in order to over come and acquire resources (C) (a maze, a territorial animal) rather than just merely taking the straightest line
The only thing that humans do differently than animals is that they have the ability to look for problems to solve when there "aren't any", in case the findings happen to be helpful later
Humans don't magically feel pain (lack of something perceived as important) better than animals or plants (and we don't have a greater ability to believe with all our emotions that our experiences matter) just because people think we're divinely separated from animals. Pets look for love and attention in the same way children do -- when they are bored and loney, not the same way our guitars and possessions do -- when we feel a compulsion to give attention. Usually they look for attention in ways we find annoying (to take away our concentration, lol)
The implication of knowing things (B) are between one's self and one's goal is that one also has the ability to see how other beings benefit one's self. Most animals are social beings, but that doesn't mean they're inherently extroverted
The only thing that makes humans different is that we have the ability to know that our search for love (Social Interaction) and God (Something that doesn't change over time) are the forces that cause us to deny our Logic.
Otherwords, everyone acts like animals because we are, but accepting that a lot of what we do is derived from our environment is what allows us to move on from simply being controlled by it
Obviously, this post isn't about treating people the same way as one treats animals because I'm still saying they are on another awareness level
And
Treating animals like they aren't smart enough to know when we're talking about them is rude, lol
But we can talk about trees behind they're bark all we want
Because I was once a child,
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HXr4bbpS2eICkGv9BcRedwsokzzv7gapSukQrG4EUSc/edit?usp=drivesdk
Here are the open source programs I've found the most use out of (and wish literally any person in my life, besides just Jeff, would have told me about, lol)
Be like *getting married
Ni be like "
My Idea of Steps in Relationship
Friendship + Attraction
Dating + Love Their Motivations
Linked + Compatible Planning
Move In + Partnership
Pet + House
Clinked + Success
Children
I know that "this is just high school stuff", but the gravitational constant is literally in the units m^(3)kg^(-1)s^(-2) (meaning take away kg s^(2), replace with m^(3) )
So, doesn't saying "As something falls, the only way to tell how much that object could move each next moment is to convert it's mass and acceleration into cuboidal space"
somewhat imply and lead to the conclusion that energy and time are convertible to distance?
(I'm asking because my ontological hypothesis depends on everything being convertible to a linear distance, which I'll probably post about later) But also, because it seems like a combined theory of everything would have a basis for conversion *of everything*
Sources Page
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ddqBuNdkgLkHFgKTIkw35SoUlXR79vsd_lZVFRrNlg0/edit?usp=drivesdk
This is my idea of social incentives; They say Please...
Try to figure out how to live effectively, We'll let you choose who you want to be
Live With Us, We'll make it better for you to survive than in the wild
Learn the information we've gained so far, We'll accept that you are a responsible enough to invest our resources in
Contribute to our society, We'll give you more of what you want than we give other people if you give us something we want that they can't give us
I wanna start referring to people by their mind so I can just call somemind "it" instead of "he" or "she"
If we need to talk about your body, let's just talk about your hair so least we can pick you out of a crowd
Somewhat Gender Controversial
(Straight males tend to be out, straight women tend to be both, and gender is just a state of relatability to a certain form of treatment)
Somewhat Gender Controversial
Why Mastodon feel safer then Twitter?
That's completely understandable! It does seem as though twitter has become engulfed in somewhat of a toxic energy, especially coupled with the fact that it's all controlled by one organization's preferences! Lol Is it just me, though, or does there seem to be a little bit less actual response here? I feel like I've just scrolled through a few hours of people's posts with like, no replies or anything😂
Hello other humans and Logical Beings!
There isn't a lot of interaction that I'm seeing, and that's sad.
If some of these instances became large corporations and created good marketing, I think I could accept it knowing there'd still be smaller ones
This is going to become the public front page of
the michaelmapes
(A chronologically organized collection of links to other places)
Aiming to gently polarize with my ~positive vibes~ !