@valleyforge @uoya Yep. Centralization also has some advantages. You can dispute charges and have a chance of getting it back. With Bitcoin you can accidentally send funds to an invalid address and the money becomes lost in a void forever.
@alex @valleyforge @uoya Even just user friendliness is a huge benefit. I can drunkenly buy shit on amazon because of paypal (as much as I hate them). Bitcoin is much harder.
Drunken sales is not gonna be your biggest demographic, of course, but still something to consider.
@alex
Pretty sure that problem of sending BTC to a mistyped address was solved years ago, no?
@valleyforge @uoya
@dsfgs @valleyforge @uoya How? As long as it’s the right length and character set, all addresses are valid. It’s just that most don’t have a private key held by a person. There’s no way to tell.
@alex
Maybe its the type of address with the 3 at the start (#segwit)?
@valleyforge @uoya
@alex @dsfgs @uoya @valleyforge Never sent a bitcoin payment, but I think they are easy for a client to check for typos. https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/194/what-happens-if-i-mistype-the-address-when-making-a-payment#:~:text=Bitcoin%20is%20very%20resistant%20to,have%20let%20you%20send%20them.
@mittimithai @dsfgs @alex @uoya so its basically the same system as credit card numbers
@valleyforge @dsfgs @alex @uoya you could send a payment to a an address that no one owns in principle, but client applications make that difficult for the user to do (and that’s easy functionality to make in an application). Credit cards are centralized so it is impossible to do there
@mittimithai @valleyforge @dsfgs @uoya Parity digits would fix the problem, but I can’t find any info about whether bitcoin addresses actually use them.
@mittimithai @dsfgs @uoya @valleyforge Seems like maybe it does:
Several of the characters inside a Bitcoin invoice are used as a checksum so that typographical errors can be automatically found and rejected. The checksum also allows Bitcoin software to confirm that a 33-character (or shorter) invoice is in fact valid and isn’t simply an invoice with a missing character.
@alex
Are these checks for all the three types of addresses?
The above resource was not clear.
@mittimithai @valleyforge @uoya
@alex @valleyforge @uoya What we’d need is just a crypto platform with protections for that sort of thing. Like an eBank I guess, which now that I think of it sounds similar to what #Apple has made
@realcaseyrollins @alex @uoya but that gives centralized power to an organization that can exert that power in the same way that visa and mastercard do
@alex @valleyforge also checks by mail :)
@valleyforge No shit, been spending the past 2 weeks integrating it. It comes with major trade-offs tho.