Thanks for that update, although I've never before seen the same bug found in multiple independent projects written in completely different technologies! 😅
Oh, isn't being an Early Adopter fun? 🤣
I suppose it's Ashby's Revenge:
“Any system that governs another, larger complex system must have a degree of complexity comparable to the system it is governing”.
The bane of computer software! 😏
I imagine it's all based on different people implementing the same standard, the same set of instructions for how it's supposed to work.
IF it really is a bug, you could imagine the different readers all misreading some ineffective standard phrasing in the same way.
I think there's a good chance it's either an interoperability problem (that might be described as a bug) or simply a missing feature they had intended to have.
