@helge @gabek @mike @atomicpoet @davew @judell @Mastodon @smallcircles "The question about Client To Server can be boiled to: Should ActivityPub Servers convert the json-ld objects making up the Activity in their own proprietary format? If you say yes, you get Mastodon. If you say no, you get a Client To Server implementation."
Yes to the question, but that isn't leading to generic ActivityPub clients that work with other #Fediverse servers.
Follow
What's the source of this quote? What dispute exactly prompted it?
I also wonder how this interacts with the encryption certificates involved in the protocol.
