Follow
Just to highlight another case of how we live in completely different worlds when we don’t stop to figure out matters of basic fact, compare this week’s breathless reporting on mifepristone against the Supreme Court’s release:
“As narrowed by the Court of Appeals, the stay that would apply if we failed to broaden it would not remove mifepristone from the market. It would simply restore the circumstances that existed (and that the Government defended) from 2000 to 2016 under three Presidential administrations.”
Press outlet after outlet said the opposite. So, would have been nice if we could all get on the same page about this kind of thing.
