@barney @Tengrain @TonyStark @edwardchampion @GreenFire @JamesBazan @mentallyalex
Sincere but probably stupid question here:
Other than using the subject to secure votes in the next election, why is it that no politician is proposing we start working on creating a new Constitutional #Amendment to protect #abortion?
If a majority of the public, even in many red states, is clearly #ProChoice, then why not work towards passing a new #Amendment? If so, then the majority-Conservative #SCOTUS can just be damned.
#AmendTheConstitution #Constitution #ConstitutionalConvention #28thAmendment
The problem is that those clear majorities of voters don't actually exist when it comes down to specifics.
For example, you may get a ton of people to agree that some abortion should be available, but once you start asking about particular methods, specific limitations on length into pregnancy, and other guidelines, disagreements show up, and the apparent consensus breaks down.
All that has happened around abortion reflects that political reality, that people have honest disagreements over abortion, and the only way to resolve the issue is to work to build actual agreement, which is unlikely to be possible.
@barney@mas.to @Tengrain @TonyStark @edwardchampion@universeodon.com @GreenFire @JamesBazan @mentallyalex@beige.party
The downside risk to calling for a national standard is that the standard might be a bad one :)
It's the all the eggs in one basket issue.
But to this point, it's easier to find strong consensus on a state by state basis considering the diversity between regions and communities in the US.
It will be hard to build a good national consensus here. It's much easier to build that at the state level. And maybe, the state experiences can help shape a national consensus over time, but only if the states do start out with the job.
@barney@mas.to @Tengrain @TonyStark @edwardchampion@universeodon.com @GreenFire @JamesBazan @mentallyalex@beige.party