@uspolitics

Wow this article is spinning hard to try to defend Clinton.

Yes, there was evidence that she broke federal laws. And there was evidence that she deliberately tried to hide it. That evidence came directly from Obama's administration and from her own admission, as she openly discussed her destruction of evidence pertinent to the inquiry.

It's even worse that this article can't even manage to make solid statements on its own terms, instead teasing meaning out of language that is pretty wishy-washy about how things seem.

I really don't know why it's so hard for us to say that both Trump and Clinton misbehaved. It's not like the one takes away from the other.

And no, just to make sure I'm not misunderstood, that doesn't say anything about equivalence at all. Both cases can be judged on their own, and both people held accountable for what they did regardless of the other.