@supernovae @volkris So, you organized the calls to bring a hostile actor into the #fediverse, for profit reasons?
Sounds more and more suspect to me then.
@supernovae @volkris And with this, I do my thing, with regards to my rights to free association, and to protect myself, and my followers, and I'll block your domain now, at the user level, and will prod the admins for my server to do the same, server-wide, since it's quite obvious at this point you WANT the hostile actor inside of the #fediverse.
@ubergeek @supernovae@universeodon.com
The actor is hostile?
That just comes across as namecalling, seeking to ban someone based on a personal vendetta.
@volkris @supernovae nope. Meta historically, and currently, acts as a hostile actor.
Don't believe me? Go look:
https://www.wired.com/story/facebooks-hate-speech-policies-censor-marginalized-users/
https://www.aclu.org/news/lgbtq-rights/facebooks-discrimination-against-the-lgbt-community
Just two examples. There's plenty more, should you like.
Such policies don't strike me as hostile.
Facebook setting norms for usage of their own service is hardly imposing on others in a hostile way.
If anything it's the opposite, inviting one vision into their own environment. Building up, not tearing down.
@supernovae@universeodon.com
