@coctaanatis@mstdn.social

Right, when I say law I mean all law, not just statutes but also the Constitution, and my statement stands: if we need to change the law, including the Constitution, then we can.

Nothing in recent rulings has been particularly novel to anyone who's been following legal arguments over the last decade or two or longer. Many of these decisions had been telegraphed for quite a while, as the Court cited plenty of background for each.

I don't know why you keep referring to the failed argument as if it's authoritative. Of course I did read the dissents, and I saw that they were wrong. ::shrug::

I mean, if you'd read the winning argument you'd understand that :)