The latest indictment against is critically factually wrong right off the hop, on the very second claim in the introduction,.

It claims that "Despite having lost [..] for more than two months following election day on November 3" when the US process of presidential election doesn't choose its winner on that day.

The indictment seems largely built on that factually incorrect foundation, that's at odds with some pretty major elements of the US system for election presidents.

Not that facts matter these days... sigh

Follow

@DeborahForPlus

But that's election of electors, not election of the president, entirely different thing.

By law election of the president happens later on, and that is what this indictment both recognizes and misses, and the contradiction within the indictment is so key to why it is a sham.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.