@SNerd you haven't seen the months of evidence that they've been publicly releasing?
From government records about troubling bank transactions through public testimony delivered under oath through even Biden's own words?
You say without any evidence as if whatever news sources you're following have been declining to carry all of the evidence that has been coming out for months if not years.
@volkris
I didn’t know “troubling” bank transactions was an impeachable offense, but I guess if the news you watch says so it must be true
I mean, this is the Biden administration saying that these transactions were troubling.
I'm not watching news here. I'm watching the accusations coming directly out of civil servants of Biden's own administration.
And so Congress is looking to follow up on their reports to figure out if there is anything to them.
@volkris So you're getting these accusations directly from "civil servants?" Have you vetted your sources?
I mean the fact that those civil servants operate within the Biden administration means that technically Biden himself has vetted them for us.
But never mind that, we have an even better source as Biden himself has described his own role in leveraging federal funds to push foreign governments to act in ways that at least implicate conflicts of interest with his own family.
Again, I'm not saying these are smoking guns, and their might even be explanations to justify the evidence, but we have to admit that there is evidence if we are going to address it in the first place.
@volkris I mean have YOU vetted your sources? How do you know they work in the Biden administration, hearsay? What is your source for this stuff, Twitter?