@SteveThompson wow, the article accuses justices of playing fast and loose even as it itself engages in exactly that.

For example, concluding that the organization doesn't represent real people because of where and when it filed paperwork? The one has nothing to do with the other.

Mainly, though, this is a giant case of begging the question.

I get that the author wishes for different outcomes. Understandable! But this is not the way to get there.

it does get clicks, though. Thanks Slate.