@tc_morekindness but the court seems to have been wrong, if that's its argument.

If the court came to its conclusion based on treating the voting system as PR, when it's not, then the court was simply incorrect.

If the new court is correctly pointing out that the old court was wrong, then that's a positive thing, preserving the rule of law around their election system.

That's why I was asking specifically what the argument was, to see if the old court was right or not.

I don't care which team wins. I want to see that election laws are upheld.