@kaixin sorry about the random question, I was wondering whether interplanetary file system or distributed hash table network object stores are considered contentious in Chinese internet (ie within China's national firewall).

@screwtape
I am sorry but I don't understand what they are. 🙈 Maybe you could provide some examples or explanation?

@kaixin Thank you for helping! A distributed hash table (like ipfs) is where instead of having files like web pages, music files and things on one server, instead, people who recently downloaded them send them to you when you request them.

I wasn't 100% sure this would obviously be allowed or disallowed in Chinese internet.

@screwtape
I suspect whether it is popular here because I heard a lot about it on the Internet but I never encountered any user case. So I doubt there is the need to block them on the national firewall level. However, there are few private torrent sites I know of sharing music\games\films things like that. But they are not mainstream sites and many of them are behind campus network and deny public access. They are more of hobbyist websites hosted by volunteers, maybe from the campus themselves.

@screwtape well ipfs.io is definitely blocked by GFW and I can only visit through a proxy. And I didn't know any user case for IPFS in China either.

@kaixin I guess so, though outside China, the company Cloudflare hosts a lot of "edge computing" ipfs content so it could conceivably be a beef with the external Cloudflare as such.

@screwtape Cloudflare itself is usable here but it's not as fast as I expected though. Actually the proxy I am using right now to access Google service or any other GFW blocked service is through a VPS in US and and domain is transferred through Cloudflare and then to the VPS. Otherwise the IP is blocked by GFW too.

Follow

@kaixin @screwtape

I know this is an old thread I just came across, but I wanted to throw in that is so much more than just a Bittorrent competitor, and it's a shame that the word isn't getting out about it.

IPFS is more a database than a filesystem, and it stinks that they settled on that misleading name.

And it provides a system for referencing content that goes far beyond just the P2P aspect of it. You could engage with IPFS through normal web servers if you really wanted to.

Basically, IPFS provides a way to address database fields whereever they are, with cryptographic signing and semantic information.

The p2p part of the project is only a side benefit. A big side benefit, but a side benefit nonetheless.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.