@waitworry A reporter who picks and chooses publishing media based on personal grudges instead of effectiveness of disseminating information is doing a disservice.
@pixplz well we clearly disagree about the importance of this reporting.
I mean I take your example and say YES if what I'm reporting is substantial and worthwhile then I would post it on that website even if I disagree with how it's being run.
Ridiculous? No, in line with my goal of getting good information to the public. Practical and effective.
I think you're a fool for giving up that platform, but great, we both think each other are fools. Yay social media.
@pixplz euphemism? No. Accurate description.
Great, you don't like how Twitter is being run. Fantastic.
But that's a you problem, and if you would like to actually engage in effective journalism then you're going to have to suck it up and engage with some people that you don't necessarily like because they are the ones who need to have their misinformation debunked.
Sorry that's not your choir to preach to. But it is the echo chamber that needs to be pierced for the good of society.
I'm sorry journalism is hard. I'm sorry the real world involves people you don't like.
But if we're going to work for the good of society then sometimes we have to engage with the problems of society.
As gross as that may be to you.
