Follow
@birdutterance well it's about balance and compromise around educated consensus where lines should be drawn.
When you talk about freedom needing to be present as a minimum that doesn't sound like being open to respecting things like bodily autonomy. Rather, it sounds like a pretty open door to quashing of actions and ideas that the folks in power happen to dislike.
It's not about everything goes. It's about sitting down and saying, ok, are we really going to enforce this level of conformity? Or might we appreciate that when people have more freedom than the bare minimum, some actually great and important things can happen?
