@lawyersgunsnmoney SCOTUS rulings are public, and we can see from them that these claims about being political hacks are nonsense, just conspiracy theories.
I mean, what arguments specifically do you find indication of political hackery?
You're throwing out these claims, but specifically what arguments of the court do you think are wrong and why?
@lawyersgunsnmoney but that exchange goes directly against what you are arguing here
@lawyersgunsnmoney in the exchange that I think you're referring to the lawyer specifically did not answer yes your honor. The lawyer pushed back very hard against that position.
Yes, you're falling for conspiracy theories based on lies, and if you would look into it a bit more you would see that the claims are false, so you wouldn't be so quick to fall in for the conspiracy theories.
