@lin11c No, the ruling was focused entirely on what a state can't do rather than what an insurrectionist can do.

That's how US courts work: since the question was whether the state could act, that's what the Court answered, not the separate question about whether an insurrectionist can be president.

It wasn't the question before the Court, so the Court didn't answer that question.
@IAmDannyBoling @Stinson_108 @atrupar