@Captain_Jack_Sparrow @volkris @cjd @Captain_Jack_Sparrow @volkris
I mean, it's true though. However, would some less corrupt/competent have saved more lives than #Fauci? Without a doubt.

He did somewhat a bit worse than the bare minimum, which is a lot different than doing nothing but harm.
We can tell from Sweden excess mortality data that doing exactly nothing would have saved a lot more lives overall than mandates and lockdowns.

Fauci likely saved many very old folks with a very short remaining lifespan at the expense of tens of thousands of people who would've had long lives ahead of them if only they were able to receive routine care and screenings, and tens of thousands more who would not have died deaths of despair absent the draconian restrictions on work and social life.
@nicholas @Captain_Jack_Sparrow @cjd @volkris @realcaseyrollins how can a jab that increases your chance of catching covid, and caused a horriffic 40% increase in all-cause mortality, have saved anyone? delusional cope. it saved exactly zero people
Follow

@meowski I can answer that: because statistics.

It's like saying, how could anyone playing the lottery have won when playing the lottery means you increased your chances of having a lighter wallet?

That's just how averaging works.

You're asking how there could be outliers, and well, that's how the calculation works.

@nicholas @Captain_Jack_Sparrow @cjd @realcaseyrollins

@volkris @nicholas @Captain_Jack_Sparrow @cjd @realcaseyrollins absurd, this is like saying if 100 people shoot themselves in the head and one doesn't die, while the other 99 died, that one person was helped by the bullet

it's hard to admit you were conned. you're like the email scam victim who wants to keep sending money to the nigerian prince

STOP. just stop it now, you were conned
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.