"#Project2025 the blueprint for a second #Trump term, includes plans to remake America’s agriculture and nutrition policy at every turn.
The plan explicitly calls to ignore climate risks, viewing climate policy as unrelated to agriculture.It would deregulate the USDA,loosening oversight over what goes into what we eat and drink–even baby formula. It would even kick hundreds of thousands off of food benefits."
@eddeeMN and Trump has explicitly rejected the plan.
So Trump and other high-profile conservatives have joined with critica of Heritage to say that they are misguided and that this is not the way forward for the country.
It's not a blueprint for a second Trump term because Trump has said that's not anything he's interested in going by.
@usernamesAreTricky there's a really well-known prototypical logical fallacy that most serial killers drink milk therefore drinking milk must be a sign of a serial killer.
Same thing here.
Just because this rejected white paper does have some overlap with Trump policy doesn't mean Trump supports it despite his rejection.
I mean, we could also say that the Harris campaign supports it because both of them recognize the presidency.
No, sometimes when somebody agrees with you you should take yes for an answer instead of pushing forward with the conspiracy theory.
Do you like what heritage wrote? Think it's a good idea? No? Well Trump and mainstream conservatives say it's not a good idea, so they're on your side here dude. Why promote it?