Four years ago, when the choice was between an old white man and a fascist, WaPo found the courage to endorse the not-fascist. But now that the choice is between a Black woman and a fascist, they're "returning to our roots of not endorsing presidential candidates." Interesting, huh?
npr.org/2024/10/25/nx-s1-51653

Follow

@fraying Well more importantly, Harris is awful.

It has nothing to do with her color, she's just a rotten candidate, and it was obvious since before the Democratic Party powerful decided to nominate her for some reason.

Sometimes people don't support people who are simply not worth supporting. It doesn't have to be any more complicated than that.

Harris has been unable to show that she has any idea how to be an effective president, she has botched interview after interview, she did poorly in the debate, and she has just generally been an awful person.

Has nothing to do with her color, she's just an awful person not worth standing behind.

We need to hold the Democratic Party responsible for their bad choice.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.