unusual_whales  
BREAKING: TikTok says it’s restoring service in the U.S. after Trump provides assurances #news #finance #economics #stocks #options
Follow

@gabriel Oh it's definitely a something burger.

Between the politics and power shown by the incoming administration through the long-lasting legal consequences of the Supreme Court ruling, this has some serious indirect effects.

@volkris@qoto.org
Do you know of a good breakfown of the ruling?
Not familiar witht the law itself and the decision.

@PamelaDrew @gabriel @volkris

Can you guys tell me how this is *fundamentally* different than Parler or other takedowns, such as American Herald Tribune, RT, Telesur, press TV, the crippling of lbry, & many other lesser known domain seizures.

These were all "legal", adjudicated, sometimes even in the name of "national security".

When something is unwanted by a powerful interest, it's destroyed, regardless of the PR that accompanies the action.

This is easier in the Internet age.

To the best of my understanding the other platforms were dropped by Amazon & Apple they were not banned by legislation.
Law is not a strong area for me but pretty sure the difference is creation of legal precedent that sets TicToc apart & threatens all web activity.. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/04/could-tiktok-ban-bill-criminalize-vpn-use-the-eff-says-its-not-impossible/
Indeed some of us remember Clipper Chip at the outset of government wish to control the Internet and have back door surveillance for web traffic.. banning what Uncle Sam can't infiltrate is predictable evolution.. free speech, privacy & autonomy the ultimate threat to ruling elite! :~)

@jazzilla as others seem to have said, The difference is that this is fundamentally different because our elected representatives passed a law specifically targeting TikToc.

This isn't mere harassment from the government that might be legal, if that's what you're talking about. This is a specific law signed by the president with the specific intention recognized by the courts to shutter this one platform as it exists today.

To me that's a striking difference. It's not a general law about how things should work, it was a targeted piece of legislation specifically trying to take down this company because it had connections to a specific other country.

@PamelaDrew @gabriel

@volkris

It's fundamentally the same.

But there's an improvement:
It's official policy.

So now it's out of the dark and into the realm of supposedly representative democracy.

Now it infringes on ppl's sensibilities. It can't be easily sidelined or downplayed. It gets entangled with power interests, in the open instead of backroom deals between the NSA, CIA and doj.

If we're going to continue down this road, it's better that everyone see it.

justice.gov/opa/pr/united-stat

@PamelaDrew @gabriel

@PamelaDrew @gabriel @volkris

We may have all been had in multiple ways here... Where the worst of all possibilities all come true.

@gabriel

Smells like miracle ear.
You get the public display AND the Savior.
Be sure you vote right. 🤦‍♂️

@volkris @PamelaDrew

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.