@cmconseils
3 memes are of Fascist Freak Show on Steroidz!!!
The 4th one is of a possible solution.
Ask Leymah Gbowee, about the power of women in unity.
@stanleyHootzz @cmconseils " only one member of the media was executed during the Nuremberg trials. According to Richard Wilson, professor of anthropology and law at the University of Connecticut, Julius Streicher was sentenced to death for running the the anti-Semitic newspaper Der Steurmer, which was a "central element of the Nazi propaganda machine."
#Source
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/doctors-media-hung-nuremberg-trial/
@JizzelEtBass @cmconseils
I reckon the pen is mightier than the sword we have certainly bear witness to in the 2016 elections.
They The Judges were to SOFT on these FASCIST COCKSUCKERZ!
Dead Fascists outside Stalingrad 1944, is what 300,000 plus dead Fascists looks like, on 1,000 plus acres.
Stacked 4 to 5 feet high.
@stanleyHootzz @cmconseils #SCOTUS is a completely lawless body, captured by DJT.
The state of Virginia violated Federal Law by purposefully removing Registered US Citizens from the Voter roll in direct violation of the National Voter Registration Act which doesn't allow changes 90 days before a federal Election. The Youngkin administration took this action on the literal day that the "Quiet Period" took effect (90 days before November 5th is August 7th) on purpose.
As all three branches of government are completely captured by Fascists, I am not looking forward to the suspension of #HabeasCorpus or the eventual #ConcentrationCamps along the US/Mexico border which will house Immigrants, Queers, leftists, and any other "enemies" DJT sees fit to kidnap, torture and kill.
@JizzelEtBass you beg the question here.
You say VA violated federal law, but the whole point is a dispute over whether the federal law actually applied to this case. VA says it doesn't, and that's why there's a dispute in court.
NVRA absolutely DOES allow changes 90 days before the election. It explicitly says so, right there in the statute.
Someone's misinforming you.
As for SCOTUS being captured by DJT, that case would be easier to make if it hadn't ruled against him pretty often.
Again, the story you've been told doesn't really match the facts.
@stanleyHootzz @cmconseils
@volkris @stanleyHootzz @cmconseils
"NVRA absolutely DOES allow changes 90 days before the election. It explicitly says so, right there in the statute.
Someone's misinforming you."
It sure does, here is the text:
1) NVRA of 1993
"(2)(A) A State shall complete, not later than 90 days prior to
the date of a primary or general election for Federal office, any program the purpose of which is to systematically remove the names
of ineligible voters from the official lists of eligible voters.
(B) Subparagraph (A) shall not be construed to preclude—
(i) the removal of names from official lists of voters on a
basis described in paragraph (3) (A) or (B) or (4)(A) of subsection (a);"
"(3) provide that the name of a registrant may not be removed from the official list of eligible voters except—
(A) at the request of the registrant;
(B) as provided by State law, by reason of criminal
conviction or mental incapacity; or...
(4) conduct a general program that makes a reasonable effort to remove the names of ineligible voters from the official
lists of eligible voters by reason of—
(A) the death of the registrant; "
2) VA State law § 24.2-427
( #Source :
1) https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/COMPS-14252/pdf/COMPS-14252.pdf
2) https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title24.2/chapter4/section24.2-427/
)
As the voters were systematically removed from the rolls within the 90 day quiet period and not for the carve outs:
A) request by registrant,
B) Due to Criminal or Mental incapacity as provided by state law or
C) death of registrant,
but rather due to immigration status as provided by the automated system at the VA -DMV. This is a clear violation of the NVRA.
Please explain your logic how VA did not violate Federal law.
@JizzelEtBass You're begging the question..
Virginia argued in court that the voters were NOT systematically removed because the process was based on individual determinations that were left up to the judgment of individual precincts.
So whether or not that counts as systematic or not is the crux of the dispute.
VA says this option was even pre-cleared by the federal government, as I recall from the filings.
There's a bit more to it, but that's what it comes down to, this not being systematic and therefore not running a foul of the NVRA.
But at least we've moved past the claim that the NVRA does not permit changes during that period before the election. Now the issue is that precedent prevents courts from ordering changes that would disrupt elections.
