The last few #SCOTUS rulings have shown that Any Coney Barrett and Ketanji Jackson Brown have knives out for each other. I think in a few decades, most of what the Roberts Court has done will be overturned and used to establish a precedential rule of coherent congruity of decisions preventing the creation of (seemingly) arbitrary exceptions.
@gkmizuno sure, none of those majority opinions back your claims.
Want to try again?
Trump v CASA
AB: "JUSTICE JACKSON, however, chooses a startling line of attack [not] tethered [...] to any doctrine whatsoever."
"We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument [...] JUSTICE JACKSON decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary."
KJ: "I have no doubt that, if judges must allow the Executive to act unlawfully in some circumstances, as the Court concludes today, executive lawlessness will flourish."
Do you want more?
@gkmizuno honestly I want a lot less.
KJ was going off the deep end, as she often does, and plenty of people are pointing out that she doesn't seem to know what's going on in the world. I would like a lot less of her blabber.
KJ has no doubt. Well maybe she should have some doubts because she doesn't know what she's talking about.
The other Supreme Court Justices constantly try to give her remedial courses on how the courts work. She really is an embarrassment.
@volkris pick any of the majority opinions written by Barrett since January.