@maeve_bkk no, that gets the case backwards.
The issue before SCOTUS is that lower courts found section 2 to REQUIRE racial gerrymander.
The argument is that in requiring racial gerrymander, section 2 is unconstitutional.
The confusion in Louisiana v. Callais highlights that VRA may have had best of intentions, but is kind of a mess to implement.
@volkris I will suspend judgement until the case is argued and information is made public.