This undermining of the Court and the public interest is a bit of a chicken and egg deal:
First gin up doubt and then answer public questions with misinformation about what happened in the Court, thus amplifying those doubts and providing more room to misinform.
No, the Court didn't take away rights, weaken voting protections, or do a hundred other things that conspiracy theories against the court insist.
If folks read the opinions they'd see those claims easily debunked.