I think this is an example of influencers on the #conservative side with this recent approach to treating all politics as if it was a team sport when it's absolutely not, and they don't know what they're talking about.
But no, all the people saying that the #NoKings demonstrations would have #MAGA folks terrified were obviously not understanding what they were fighting against.
Whether they should be scared or not, that's just not how that mindset perceives the world.
@kevbob and this is why we don't generally appreciate extrajudicial killings.
@johnquiggin more US states need to stop interfering with the rights of workers to offer their labor on their own terms.
Eastern Europe doesn't get it, but hopefully someday American culture will.
@sccdp I don't think having a street party vibe is the marker of success that you might think it is...
@aerofreak conservatives would say, yes.
And they're not entirely wrong to the extent that they want the country to change, to progress, to become better, at least as they see it becoming better.
Yes, to the extent Trump is aware of any of this, conservative media will say that these people are all haters of America, at least as it is, they hate a lot of the stuff going on.
And I do too, I hate that we have this President and wish we would do better!
So, Mr Trump would say these people are all left-wing extremists who hate America, and I would stand with them hating that he is in charge, but this is not the productive way to fix things.
@CindyWeinstein But that's what I saw at the rallies! I saw so much hatred, so little talk about building up, just talk about tearing down.
So many of my personal friends going to those rallies were just non-stop negativity and hate.
Johnson's job is to express the position of the House. And I imagine the majority of the House feels the way you captured there.
It's not upstaging 7 million people. It's capturing the perception of them that seems pretty consistent with how they presented themselves to me.
@courtcan More importantly, we voted for this.
Imagine the state of the country, the perspectives of voters around the country going to ballot boxes who felt that this troll was the best option moving forward.
The way to fix the country is not to yell at the troll. The troll likes that. It plays into his hands.
The way to fix the country is to engage with the voters who chose this jerk and address their concerns so they don't feel like they have to again.
That is not what I saw on my timelines.
People were not in good moods, there was a lot of anger and doubt and pushback and concern with shutdowns and court cases and everything else.
I guess the algorithm must have tilted things for that person.
@RememberUsAlways I heard the interview, and that's not at all what they said.
I really don't know how you got that from that interview.
@molytov Yeah the protests are stupid and counterproductive, lending Republicans plenty of material for their upcoming campaigns, but shutting down road traffic only makes it worse, giving Republicans even more to run on.
Liberals need to stop electing and reelecting the same ineffective politicians. It makes no sense to go protest and then elect the guy that's causing the problems they are protesting against.
THAT is the way to make change at this point.
You're saying a bunch of stuff here that's simply not true.
The US government has been disabled, gutted and incapable of non-partisan law enforcement? Obviously not considering the tremendous amount of money it spends on the opposite every single year.
You see a political party following the law? Where? Every party is breaking it, and we're good with it. We keep reelecting the folks breaking laws.
I really think you're espousing a perspective that is not in line with the real world here, and proposing solutions based on misunderstandings of the problems.
No it's not satire or parody, it's trolling, plain and simple.
And the way to respond to it is the way you respond to any troll on the internet. It's the same strategic pattern.
Yeah, the American people elected this troll to be president knowing full well what they were electing. So the important thing is to respond to the folks who empowered the guy.
But Trump himself? It's the old internet adage: don't feed the trolls.
@bruce He's trolling you.
The president is a troll, this is nothing new.
But it sounds like you're falling for his game.
That's my case I know many minorities in my close Social circle, and not a single one showed any sign of fear. As they were organizing carpools and stuff, fear never came up.
That's just not correct. The main weapon ordinary people have is their votes and they keep using their votes to support ineffective politicians.
Not at all, and part of the problem is that these protests play into his hands instead of opposing him in more effective ways.
His side will be using scenes from these protests in their campaign advertisements to garner support and get reelected.
That's why it's so important to call it out.
This kind of stuff got Trump reelected in the first place. I opposed it then, I call it out now for the same reason: folks need to stop giving his side this ammunition.
No, #Trump isn't "terrified" of #NoKings protests. He doesn't even know they're happening if his handlers don't tell him.
The #GOP In general isn't terrified about it, they welcome it, because they're going to use framing of it in their campaign materials. It plays into their game.
These protesters are being played.
It's in the eye of the beholder.
The problem is, if these protesters want to attract support from others, they need to realize that they do look foolish in the eyes of many of the people who they need to convince over to their side.
Otherwise they're just preaching to the choir in silly outfits.
Pretty much sums it up. A whole bunch of people spending a lot of resources to tell Trump not to be a king while he is saying he never was, so this is all pointless and those people look foolish.
I think the most pressing and fundamental problem of the day is that people lack a practically effective means of sorting out questions of fact in the larger world. We can hardly begin to discuss ways of addressing reality if we can't agree what reality even is, after all.
The institutions that have served this role in the past have dropped the ball, so the next best solution is talking to each other, particularly to those who disagree, to sort out conflicting claims.
Unfortunately, far too many actively oppose this, leaving all opposing claims untested. It's very regressive.
So that's my hobby, striving to understanding the arguments of all sides at least because it's interesting to see how mythologies are formed but also because maybe through that process we can all have our beliefs tested.
But if nothing else, social media platforms like this are chances to vent frustrations that on so many issues both sides are obviously wrong ;)