volkris @volkris@qoto.org
I think the most pressing and fundamental problem of the day is that people lack a practically effective means of sorting out questions of fact in the larger world. We can hardly begin to discuss ways of addressing reality if we can't agree what reality even is, after all.
The institutions that have served this role in the past have dropped the ball, so the next best solution is talking to each other, particularly to those who disagree, to sort out conflicting claims.
Unfortunately, far too many actively oppose this, leaving all opposing claims untested. It's very regressive.
So that's my hobby, striving to understanding the arguments of all sides at least because it's interesting to see how mythologies are formed but also because maybe through that process we can all have our beliefs tested.
But if nothing else, social media platforms like this are chances to vent frustrations that on so many issues both sides are obviously wrong ;)
Joined Dec 2022
@bespacific I mean, it's legal. Where is Congress? Well the people that we elected to the legislature passed the laws that made this possible.
And governors that we elected approved of it.
We voted for this. If we want change we have to convince our fellow citizens to change their minds.
@Yehuda other people can certainly provide that access even better than fediverse would be able to respond to the same situation.
On this platform instances could block the state, but on BlueSky individuals could choose to posts into the state without relying on instances choosing to do so.
Bluesky is better in these sort of contacts than fediverse.
I mean, it's because a lot of people understand how the process works, and how the justice department is withholding a lot of information that it can release at any moment without any permission from any judge, but instead the justice department is making a show of trying to release this other information that is under judicial seal.
It's a smoke screen.
The justice department can release its information on its own but it's trying to distract us with this other stuff.
@Yehuda I don't think that's quite right. I don't think bluesky is federated but rather decentralized beyond federation.
Basically, Bluesky has the decentralization that fediverse likes to claim that it has, but it really doesn't.
Fediverse is centralized among instances. That's what it refers to as federation. Bluesky, on the other hand, decentralizes down to users.
I think it's worth getting the terminology right because Bluesky ends up fulfilling the mission of decentralization better than a lot of the people who try to criticize it appreciate it.
@BagOfNails All the people that you mention actually did things.
Bad things, yeah, that's why they're in the books.
Trump really didn't, though. He failed and didn't really do much of anything.
For better or worse the guy has a long history of just failing to do anything, and if more people pointed that out we might not be in this position.
@BagOfNails I would say it's arguably worse than that: history won't record it at all because it was a complete dud.
Trump wants attention, that's really all he has going for him, and the Alaska summit is going to be ignored in the history books because it was a complete failure and no one cares.
He's a convicted felon because he's an idiot.
I think is really clear that Trump broke a bunch of laws, because he's an idiot who doesn't know what the laws are and doesn't care, but setting that aside, in this particular case the performance before the jury wasn't particularly strong.
Word is that the defense wanted to take out the key witness holding the prosecution case together, but Trump the idiot told them not to, and so he got convicted.
Because he's an idiot.
@faraiwe Yeah contrarian like saying that the Earth is not actually flat to folks that keep spouting off insisting that it is.
Contortions? No it is what it is. Very much centralized? No it's the opposite as the protocol is founded on the exact opposite of that, as anybody can verify, but you can deny that all day long for some reason, but why?
Why insist on this falsehood? Are you just trying to gaslight?
What's your motivation here for insisting on things that aren't true? Again, we can look at the protocol and see that it's the opposite of what you're saying, so why are you saying the opposite?
Why is it so important for you to promote that false narrative?
@RonSupportsYou Oh no, not at all.
It's not that Biden and Harris underestimated Trump and therefore lost to him, is that they were shit candidates. It's that as bad as Trump was, Democratic establishment figures overestimated Biden and Harris.
Trump won by default because Democrats ran shit candidates that nobody wanted to vote for. Just about anybody else would have beaten Trump.
The moment Democrats settled on Harris as the replacement candidate I threw up my hands and said well we're just screwed.
Democrats should have run a better candidate than Harris, but they basically forfeited the race to Trump by running her. It was pretty obvious to me at the time at least.
@RonSupportsYou What? It absolutely explains it!
Trump wasn't feeling like his ego was being stroked enough so he lashed out. He requires stroking. He wasn't getting it to the extent that he thought he wanted it.
That's really the simplest explanation as to what happened there, he was getting bored at not getting stroked so he lashed out like a child.
Ego stroking, and the lack thereof, is a very clear explanation of that whole mess.
@RonSupportsYou were you having beers with Putin recently or something? Did he tell you that?
No this whole administration is a joke. Gabbard doesn't change that. She knows it too.
@faraiwe or... maybe it's simply true?
You can see for yourself that it's decentralized by looking at the engineering of the platform that has decentralization built into it from the ground up.
Simply asserting otherwise doesn't change what we can see for ourselves.
But you're right, it does mean that the platform is not and cannot be owned by a techbro billionaire.
I don't know why anyone would be so insistent on making such conspiratorial claims.
BlueSky isn't just a different algorithm, though. It's fundamentally designed differently, so that there isn't reliance on any one algorithm, different or not.
And it's fundamentally engineered not to be a corporate owned walled garden.
No, BlueSky isn't fediverse. It's better, with opposition to walls built into it from the ground up in a way that doesn't exist here.
@chad coup d'etat? Trump's the incumbent!
He's not going to take out himself.
These stories are ridiculous.
@chad@mstdn.ca coup d'etat? Trump's the incumbent!
He's not going to take out himself.
These stories are ridiculous.
@HeliosPi honestly, it's been more like threats of control and domination have been used to control and dominate.
For example, claims that the census would be used to round up illegal aliens probably did more to impact communities than the census itself.
Sometimes fear of the boogeyman is more impactful than the boogeyman itself.
Answer: Magic.
Unfortunately the folks in charge of US policy at the moment have no idea how anything in the real world works, so they just openly engage in magical thinking, that the world will change on a dime because they deem it so.
The food will just be made by Americans now. That's the long and short of the answer. They don't worry about little things like how exactly that will happen, how an army of Americans will show up to the fields literally tomorrow.
Putin has exactly the same thing all other world leaders have on Trump: the ability to stroke the idiot's ego.
That's it.
That's all it takes to manipulate Trump, nobody needs dirt on him or anything like that. Heck, the guy seems too brain damaged to appreciate the threat of blackmail anyway, as indicated by his performance in courts.
The thing is, since Trump is surrounded by a hundred different people all manipulating him to their different ends, he's not a puppet of any particular master, but just whoever is sucking up to him hardest at any given moment.
I spend quite a lot of time listening to the folks who promoted and voted for Trump. His voters vastly overestimated him, and he has a LONG track record of failing to live up to their fantasies, from the deep state that he didn't fix through wars that he didn't end through felony convictions that he didn't overcome.
So no, he wasn't elected because people underestimated him. How would that even work?
He was elected specifically because his voters overestimated him.
I think the most pressing and fundamental problem of the day is that people lack a practically effective means of sorting out questions of fact in the larger world. We can hardly begin to discuss ways of addressing reality if we can't agree what reality even is, after all.
The institutions that have served this role in the past have dropped the ball, so the next best solution is talking to each other, particularly to those who disagree, to sort out conflicting claims.
Unfortunately, far too many actively oppose this, leaving all opposing claims untested. It's very regressive.
So that's my hobby, striving to understanding the arguments of all sides at least because it's interesting to see how mythologies are formed but also because maybe through that process we can all have our beliefs tested.
But if nothing else, social media platforms like this are chances to vent frustrations that on so many issues both sides are obviously wrong ;)
Joined Dec 2022
volkris's choices:
