volkris @volkris@qoto.org
I think the most pressing and fundamental problem of the day is that people lack a practically effective means of sorting out questions of fact in the larger world. We can hardly begin to discuss ways of addressing reality if we can't agree what reality even is, after all.
The institutions that have served this role in the past have dropped the ball, so the next best solution is talking to each other, particularly to those who disagree, to sort out conflicting claims.
Unfortunately, far too many actively oppose this, leaving all opposing claims untested. It's very regressive.
So that's my hobby, striving to understanding the arguments of all sides at least because it's interesting to see how mythologies are formed but also because maybe through that process we can all have our beliefs tested.
But if nothing else, social media platforms like this are chances to vent frustrations that on so many issues both sides are obviously wrong ;)
Joined Dec 2022
US conservatives are convinced that protests against #Trump are staged by people being paid to protest, but pro-government demonstrations in #Iran represent the legitimate feelings of the country.
(nevermind the dissonance of then expecting the country to pivot after regime change)
The conservative movement is being run by some of the dumbest people these days.
And that's how we get folks cheering on the idiocy that Trump engages in.
volkris
boosted
I Decompiled the White House’s New App
The official White House Android app has a cookie/paywall bypass injector, tracks your GPS every 4.5 minutes, and loads JavaScript from some guy’s GitHub Pages.
Archive: ia: https://s.faithcollapsing.com/q...
#uspol-technology
https://blog.thereallo.dev/blog/decompiling-the-white-house-app
Honestly, pretty much any other branding might have been better...
"No Kings" only appeals to the already converted.
Here in the US I like to focus on how his actions are US crimes.
Trump's supporters say we shouldn't be recognizing international law in the first place. Fine. We can focus on the US laws that the convicted felon is violating.
@jonchevreau.bsky.social probably.
It's foolish to look for any logic, consistency, or strategy in Trump's pronouncements.
You have it backwards.
It wouldn't mean anything for Native Americans. It would mean treating NON-Native Americans as if they were Native Americans.
It was a case where the lower court clearly erred, as the record was stark. There wasn't anything else to ask.
So this wasn't a problem, it was a solution. No sense wasting time when there was nothing to argue and nothing to discover.
Yes, I did read all of Justice Sotomayor's dissent.
The problem is, she didn't actually describe what was in the majority opinion, so that's why I wonder if SHE read the opinion of the Court!
What she described was not what was in the majority opinion.
@cdonat what money? I don't see what you're responding to.
The financing of US weapons to Ukraine is something a whole lot of people don't understand.
The problem is, Trump is surrounded by people who won't tell him that he's losing. It's not clear that he knows.
I suspect he thought he already won, and he wants to win again, he's just frustrated that it's taking so long for the troops to get there or for Iran to cave to give him that next win.
He's an impatient little brat, but I don't think he's engaged with reality enough to know he's losing, just like in elections and court cases where he lost.
Well to seriously answer your question (because understanding the situation is important to addressing it) the two statements can be seen as true because one context is more quantitative and rules-defined than the other.
Bathroom activities are largely defined by social norms. Olympic activites are defined by rules of games.
I'd say a difference is that ActivityPub encompass quite a lot of the stack and centralizes a lot of functionality to instances while SMTP simply (ha) focuses on transport.
That difference is not trivial!
From questions of efficiency through user responsiveness and application flexibility, it pushes towards one-size-fits-all centralization.
Really, it might be the difference between http and the old platforms like AOL.
@MFennVT as is so common, Sotomayor doesn't seem to have read the opinion that she's criticizing so sensationally, as the opinion says the exact opposite of what she lays out.
The opinion leaves officials wide open for prosecution should they use gratuitous force. It only applies qualified immunity to non-gratuitous force.
Heck, that's the "qualified" in "qualified immunity"!
Sotomayor should know better.
But it's also not how it works to say the Supreme Court gets to make that call. They don't have such authority, constitutionally, regardless.
You're right that Congress can't really make laws to correct such a ruling, that's not how that works, but that's because the entire question is above them all.
@flancia.org such an openminded mindset is sadly lacking offline as well as in online communities.
Really throwing babies out with bathwater.
#ClayAndBuck:Twice now #Trump has "bamboozled" #Iran by attacking them while they were at the negotiation table.THAT's how we know Iran is negotia...
Well, to be fair it's not really about common sense. There are plenty of statutes out there that go against common sense.
Fortunately, at least in this case, the law passed by Congress didn't go so far as to make ISPs liable.
volkris
boosted
#BrianKilmeade: The US should just go take the Strait of Hormuz. We'll just own it. It'll be easy. And we should start escorting ships through--it won't be a problem. Just like we did decades ago. #USPolitics
@everton137 I think there's just not much to discuss.
Voters in the US aren't interested in electing a reasonable, responsible government, so what's there to say?
It's like a bad sitcom. There's just not much to say about it.
I think the most pressing and fundamental problem of the day is that people lack a practically effective means of sorting out questions of fact in the larger world. We can hardly begin to discuss ways of addressing reality if we can't agree what reality even is, after all.
The institutions that have served this role in the past have dropped the ball, so the next best solution is talking to each other, particularly to those who disagree, to sort out conflicting claims.
Unfortunately, far too many actively oppose this, leaving all opposing claims untested. It's very regressive.
So that's my hobby, striving to understanding the arguments of all sides at least because it's interesting to see how mythologies are formed but also because maybe through that process we can all have our beliefs tested.
But if nothing else, social media platforms like this are chances to vent frustrations that on so many issues both sides are obviously wrong ;)
Joined Dec 2022
volkris's choices:
