Is distributed computing dying, or just fading into the backdrop?
There seems to be much less excitement about distributed computing these days.
Folks saying government debt is not like a family's debt because governments can print money get that exactly backwards.
Yes, your family can print your own money. Maybe it won't be accepted because it's not considered particularly valuable. **Same as government printed money** if the government prints too much of it.
The lesson is the same in both cases: the value of money can vary.
Well no that's not right. That's not how the US system works.
The majority of Supreme Court influence comes from the recognition of lower courts, since it is a court of appeals. It's when lower courts abide by Supreme Court precedent that most of their influence impacts the world.
And thank goodness that's the case! Because the general public has no idea what the Supreme Court actually says or does or rules. There is so much misinformation out there.
So long as the lower courts are paying attention and well informed and actually abiding by the Supreme Court rulings the system will keep working, regardless of the nonsense going around social media and network television.
To give a bit more context for people outside of San Francisco, in addition to being guinea pigs for self-driving cars, SF has also become a testbed for the future of the surveillance state. In SF it's now legal for the police to monitor private surveillance cameras in real time: https://www.theverge.com/2022/9/23/23368603/san-francisco-police-private-surveillance-cameras-vote
In addition to the well-known problem with Ring cameras, the SFPD have spun off and funded a "private" nonprofit to set up cameras: https://sfsafe.org/our-mission/.
The SFPD has a history of using these cameras to surveil totally legal protests despite claiming that department policy doesn't allow that:
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/05/sfpd-obtained-live-access-business-camera-network-anticipation-tyre-nichols
Really, just look over all the EFF headlines for San Francisco, and then it'll be clear that we can't let the city be blanketed in surveillance bots.
Oh for heaven's sake...
Now we're doing the stupid pseudolegal "I don't consent to my content being used" thing here?
It wasn't legit when it was on any of the other platforms, and it's especially not legit on this platform where by posting something you are actively triggering a process by which the content is broadcast to others.
To declare that you don't consent to Meta getting your data really doesn't wash with this protocol that actively broadcasts it to them.
It's like yelling across your fence to your neighbor that you don't consent to his hearing you. You're the one yelling at him!
A distributed social network means even less control over where content goes.
Folks complaining about the #SCOTUS ruling on admissions based on what society should do are missing that the Court doesn't have authority to judge based on evaluations of what we should do.
It is to judge based on what our democratic process has said, by law, that we should do.
If we need to change the law, great! Maybe we do need to revisit and update the Civil rights act of 1964.
So let's yell at the Congress to get that done.
Yelling at SCOTUS for acts of the legislature that they don't have power over is, if anything, distraction from making progress on legal reforms that are apparently needed.
So much written about the #SCOTUS ruling on the independent state legislature theory is sensationalized way beyond recognition.
This case had absolutely nothing to do with legislatures throwing out or overruling votes.
It was purely focused on the prescription of "The Times, Places and Manner" of holding elections, which wouldn't include a legislature deciding to throw out an election that abided by the prescription.
It's just an example of how reporting on things like the Supreme Court is so misleading, so apparently intent on clickbait rather than real education.
As always, there is no substitute for actually going to the source to see what it says.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-1271_3f14.pdf
#Alito: a reasonable person wouldn't buy into the misleading ad hominem attacks ProPublica thrives on
Ah, but Sam, ProPublica doesn't sell to reasonable people, as the braying of #Fediverse demonstrates so well.
The International Standards Organization has defined a new time measurement, the fedisecond, which is the shortest humanly-measurable unit of time.
A fedisecond is defined as the interval between the announcement of an exciting new #fediverse application and the discovery that the project's lead architect and principal developer is actually Satan.
Another day in the multiverse of echo chambers:
Democrats smugly saying Republicans are freaking out about the #Trump indictment and Republicans smugly saying Democrats are freaking out about how he's succeeding despite them.
Know thy enemy, they say. Well, if either of these groups actually followed that advice, maybe we could settle some things.
Well, all ya can do is appreciate the absurdity.
Accusations of greed are funny things.
The #Reddit drama follows an all too common pattern where people are accusing others of greed because they want something the other has.
Yeah, Reddit is so greedy for charging for providing its service, but *I demand their resources.*
It's not exactly taking a high road to describe someone as greedy while claiming those resources for oneself.
(please boost)
Okay...... WHY is our instance fediblocked in the first place? and why does that include our matrix instance getting removed from joinmatrix because "they decided to deem us as controversial"??
Our instance is a non-extremist, leftist comfy instance that accepts everyone, we have nearly 1000 users and I don't really understand why we are getting blocked everywhere. The worst thing is that there is no reason behind this and nobody is able to give us a single reason about why the """"council"""" decided to block us. This is stupid.
I'm considering buying a new domain at this point. We've been on fedi with based.social and miruku.cafe since 2020, and I've been using fedi since 2018 and this is just nonsense, I'm really pissed off. (meow)
This is really helpful! ... if it works
I've been really curious about how #lemmy integrates with the rest of ActivityPub but haven't had time to look deeply into it.
So far my instance doesn't have any posts from this particular lemmy... um... board? group? whatever it's called, but I'll have to try it out more in the future.
Yep.
An awful lot of people don't follow things like #SCOTUS opinions closely enough to know they're being sold a narrative that just doesn't match the record.
The liberal vs conservative description of the Supreme Court makes for dramatic headlines, but the decision record of the Court doesn't really match that naive narrative.
Key phrase: "165 Democrats - more than the 149 Republicans who voted for it - backed the measure and pushed it through"
Listening to Republicans today debating among themselves over the #DebtCeiling deal, there's a big problem that the hardliners literally don't know how federal finances work, and so they vastly overestimate #GOP power in this situation.
If Biden can't borrow money to pay for programs that the #GOP likes, then he won't, and their favorite projects will be harmed. This *empowers* Biden, but they have no idea.
Today's debate on the right was all about the moderates trying to inform their young colleagues as to the actual rules of the game, to inform strategy, but the hardliners weren't interested in learning... unsurprisingly.
Just goes to show how important civics education is, especially for those actually in government.
Since I guess everything is political these days, I'll identify as extremely liberal but without a home in US politics.
Mainly, there's so much misinformation out there that people in society have trouble even organizing into coherent political groupings. So I'd rather not talk about politics but instead focus on information and education. Nothing else matters until the bedrock of fact is buttressed.
But... people are always going to be wrong on the internet, as the saying goes.
So: Old man yells at clouds is a famous joke from The Simpsons, and it probably fairly describes what we do when venting on social media.
Just speaking into the void, since I figure it's an exercise in futility to conduct discussions on these platforms.