Anyone got an example of an #ActivityPub object with type: "Article"
? #mastoDev
@m well it's not that posts are called notes but that of the types defined by ActivityStreams some interfaces have chosen to mark content that way.
As per the standard a note "Represents a short written work typically less than a single paragraph in length."
Arguably this that I'm typing here is a document, not a note, regardless of what Mastodon thinks of it.
https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#object-types
@timbray
Mastodon restrictions:
Issue 1: You can only upload max 4 photos per post.
Issue 2: You can only see max 4 photos per post EVEN if that post have more than 4 attached. It throws everything else to a black hole without informing its users that they are missing something.
For Issue 2, all other #fediverse software will display the images attached. They won't shoot content into a blackhole.
For Issue 1, different fediverse software have different limitations, but definitely not max of 4 per post.
So, personally, if you want to use the fediverse for images, art, photography, your best option is Pixelfed; or any other fediverse software for that matter as long as it is not Mastodon.
^_~
@dansup
An update on and description of #BlueSky distributed capabilities, including a long segment on distributed labeling and moderation, and how the way #Mastodon / #Fediverse handles it promotes contention on this platform.
I always say, there's a lack of focus on technology serving users here, with instances being the primary focus, and that's a shame.
Listening to #metal #music? Posting about it on mastodon.social?
There are more underground ways to metal up your timeline! Join metalhead.club 💪
... and contribute to a more decentralized #Fediverse 🤘
Conservative media loves to repeat that the NY court imposed improper penalties against Trump's businesses considering that they were already being overseen by a court appointed official that would keep them from doing wrong.
Problem is, the overseer reported to the court that they kept doing wrong.
It's a case where the details swing the superficial claim in the other direction.
So many get wrong, and so many misreport, that the #SCOTUS is to rule on the safety of mifepristone. It is not.
The Court has neither the expertise, the legal jurisdiction, nor the interest in making such a determination. It's absolutely not what the Court is doing.
Instead, what the Court is to rule on is specifically the legal questions surrounding whether the executive branch followed legal procedures as it acted.
It seems that the FDA didn't follow the legal process and botched this, and we should be holding executive branch officials responsible for their failure there.
All of the drama protesting the Court misplaces the real blame and lets those responsible off the hook, and is so counterproductive to the goals of those protesters.
The same thing that Threads might allegedly do to Mastodon is apparently absolutely desirable when Mastodon does it to the rest of the Fediverse; CW: long (914 characters), Fediverse meta, non-Mastodon Fediverse meta, Threads/Meta/Facebook/Zuckerberg
Many here joined the bandwagon of outrage over #Trump's use of the word bloodbath, but I don't think many realize how counterproductive that was.
#Conservatives have been milking that outrage to their benefit, using it to frame anti-Trump speakers as out of touch or flat out duplicitous, saying they're intentionally misunderstanding or misrepresenting what Trump was saying.
The thing is, what Trump was [apparently] saying is actually idiotic. THAT is what needs to be called out.
It's just the sad norm of strategic misstep: Trump will say something really stupid, but instead of pointing out how dumb he is, folks give him not only a pass but actual ammunition through unfounded attacks.
And that's how we got and may get President Trump.
It's instructive that the most rabidly anti #TikTok conservative figures seem to be coming from a place of being completely out of touch with and misunderstanding the youths.
I keep hearing them say, Where did [insert idea] come from? Nobody was talking about that before the Chinese started manipulating kids through the TikToks!
But of course, they were talking about it, just in different circles that the speaker wasn't aware of.
This says a lot about many topics and many sides, but generally:
Echo chambers promote ignorance that leads to assumptions that manifest in heavy handed non-solutions to misidentified problems.
And all too naturally, those proposals will tend to be rather authoritarian efforts to fix people.
Implementing a “Share on Mastodon” button for a blog
Normally, adding a share button to a blog is a trivial task. In case of Mastodon, it is complicated by the fact that you need to choose your home instance. And it is further complicated if you decide to support further Fediverse applications beyond …
https://palant.info/2023/10/19/implementing-a-share-on-mastodon-button-for-a-blog/
These days the phrase "you can't make this stuff up" is so overused that really it comes across as,
Oh no, I CAN make this stuff up, and I can make a lot of other stuff up too.
You can't?
Are you really so low functioning that this is beyond your imagination?
Well that explains a lot of the other dumb ideas you have.
You can't make this stuff up has become a brag from people who, well, honestly probably aren't smart enough to make such things up on their own.
Apparently this is a website demonstrating #Fediverse / #Mastodon and #BlueSky interactions all being intermingled as they engage with the post.
I'm not sure exactly what's going on, but at first glance it's pretty interesting to see.
https://nerdy.dev/this-site-now-supports-at-protocol-mentions-and-interactions
@annaleen I can understand the meaning of losing Twitter for many people, who made their living by connecting there.
However, Twitter was as public as X is today, meaning it wasn't. It never was yours nor "ours". If it was actually public, it could not have been sold to Musk in the first place. The means of its past owners just aligned more with yours, by incident.
Oof, I just realized i forgot to hashtag USPolitics, which I always try to do to help people filter that out of their own timelines.
My apologies to anyone who sees my post but was trying to avoid politics on their feeds! I completely understand that position!
The big problem with the #Biden State of the Union speech was that instead of speaking to the whole country about the whole country, it focused on speaking to his own choir about himself and his reelection.
That's why people are criticizing it as a campaign speech.
If you're a Biden supporter, realize that the speech did not invite non-supporters, including independents, to join in his efforts. It appealed only to those already on board, which is not productive in terms of actually getting those efforts done.
In other words, if you're in favor of what Biden was calling for, you too should be critical that this #SOTU won't help get those things done.
The speech seemed focused on helping nobody... except Joe Biden's personal reelection.
Growing up in the US, decades ago, I was cautiously optimistic about the future for the US government:
Sure, folks had ideological, philosophical, and political differences, but we'd keep on having a big social conversation, challenging each other, to come to a positive consensus, all as the government itself continued to maintain its core functions, shaped by the ongoing debate.
It seemed at the time as if we were working with a rough draft, and things would keep getting better. The government had good bones, to borrow an analogy.
The thing I find so depressing about #Trump as the #GOP
nominee isn't ideological. It's that we're now facing a race where the idea of actually administering a functional government isn't even a significant issue to voters. I never see it coming up in mainstream conversation from either the left or the right.
This is one reason I'm so obsessed about #USPolitics, because in my lifetime it's regressed so terribly, from a functional government that's responding to productive debate to one where functionality isn't particularly interesting to the average voter.
The US population has lost faith in government over this time, but the problem is, well, that's what they voted for by nominating people like #Biden and Trump.
It's why Super Tuesday was a symbol of this regression of the US government to me, even if it had become inevitable.
I remain struck by hearing a #GOP voter say he would be voting for #Trump over #Haley in the primary purely because Haley can't win the primary.
Not the general election, the primary.
That he was voting in.
The most charitable interpretation I have for this is that he wanted to feel good about having voted on the winning side of the primary, fitting in with the crowd.
But really, I think so many voters simply don't know how voting works.
@charlescwcooke: "The gap between what is actually a strong legal argument and what the press insists is a strong legal argument has rarely been wider."
#TrumpvAnderson #SCOTUS #PresidentTrump #2024election #14Am
https://twitter.com/charlescwcooke/status/1764679007415451796
I think the most pressing and fundamental problem of the day is that people lack a practically effective means of sorting out questions of fact in the larger world. We can hardly begin to discuss ways of addressing reality if we can't agree what reality even is, after all.
The institutions that have served this role in the past have dropped the ball, so the next best solution is talking to each other, particularly to those who disagree, to sort out conflicting claims.
Unfortunately, far too many actively oppose this, leaving all opposing claims untested. It's very regressive.
So that's my hobby, striving to understanding the arguments of all sides at least because it's interesting to see how mythologies are formed but also because maybe through that process we can all have our beliefs tested.
But if nothing else, social media platforms like this are chances to vent frustrations that on so many issues both sides are obviously wrong ;)